Almost every Burlesque
performer has, somewhere in their blurb the line 'I am a professional
burlesque dancer' or similar.
This irks me on many
levels. Firstly, and most quickly, I don't believe you should call
yourself a dancer if you can't dance. Walking around in time to music
shedding a pretty costume is all well and good: it is performance, it
can be artistic, it may be entertaining, but it is not dancing.
Secondly: what is
'professional' in this context? The OED defines the term variously as
“Engaged in a profession as a means of livelihood”, or
“Characteristic of or befitting a profession” And this is the
issue. Generally, if something is your main form of income, that is
your profession.
However, what if a
performer is of a very high standard, working in good quality shows,
yet they have a day job, and burlesque is merely a hobby they enjoy,
which provides a little extra pocket money on the side? Do they have
the right to call themselves a professional burlesque performer as
they conduct and present themselves in a professional manner?
Conversely, and less occasionally encountered, take the example of a
sub-standard performer who works a couple of nights in lower quality
shows: do they have the right to call themselves a professional as
they do not have another job and therefore relies on the money they
may earn from performing?
Attitude also plays a
huge role in determining professionalism (take the second definition
from the OED): a performer can be paid well for a show, yet behave
shockingly backstage, or turn in a sub-par performance. This would be
talked about as “behaving unprofessionally” however they have
been paid well. On the other hand, a lower paid, or unpaid, performer
may arrive and behave impeccably or produce a stand-out act: this
would have been “professional conduct” so who can judge who was
the professional or the amateur?
On a slight tandem:
Amateur does NOT mean 'bad'!. Amateur Dramatics companies do not
advertise themselves as professional performances despite the fact
that many are of an extremely high standard. However this is
something to discuss at another time.
It is a tricky subject
and one that is much discussed on various forums. I, personally,
trained in performance: my qualification was called 'Professional
Musical Theatre' and I gained a Distinction. Does this qualification
alone entitle me to call myself a professional performer when I spent
my first year out of college working in a bar and schlepping to and
from auditions several times a week?
The blurring of
definition is possibly what has led to the confusion. Performers
state that they are 'professional' as they expect, usually quite
rightly, to be paid for their performances, but it carries with it
expectations of a certain standard: both in performance level and
personal conduct.
It's not for me to say
who can or can't call themselves a professional burlesque dancer –
people can call themselves whatever they wish, but I do believe there
should be more awareness of what the term actually means and the
responsibility you create for yourself when you use it.
xx
No comments:
Post a Comment